Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: September 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6198) 1.14: iconv.m4 is incomplete
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6198) 1.14: iconv.m4 is incomplete

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, reinpost@xxxxxxxxxx, chrisk@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#6198) 1.14: iconv.m4 is incomplete
From: "Jason Short" <jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:54:04 -0700
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Christian Knoke wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:17:12PM -0700, Jason Short wrote:
> 
>>[jdorje - Mon Sep 22 12:01:44 2003]:
>>
>>>Christian Knoke wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>chris@max:~/freeciv/cvs/beta/freeciv> cp ../../freeciv/m4/iconv.m4
>>>
>>>m4/
>>>
>>>>chris@max:~/freeciv/cvs/beta/freeciv> autogen.sh
>>>>+ checking for autoconf >= 2.52 ... found 2.13, not ok !
>>>>+ checking for autoconf >= 2.13 ... found 2.13, ok.
>>>>+ checking for automake >= 1.4 ... found 1.4-p5, ok.
>>>>+ checking for xgettext >= 0.10.36 ... found 0.10.40, ok.
>>>>+ checking for msgfmt >= 0.10.36 ... found 0.10.40, ok.
>>>>+ creating acinclude.m4
>>>>+ running aclocal ...
>>>>aclocal: acinclude.m4: 3119: duplicated macro `AC_LIB_ARG_WITH'
>>>>aclocal: both `configure.ac' and `configure.in' present: ignoring
>>>>`configure.in'
>>>>
>>>>aclocal failed - check that all needed development files are present
>>>
>>>on
>>>
>>>>system
>>>
>>>The lib-prefix.m4 has two definitions of AC_LIB_ARG_WITH, with
>>>different
>>>numbers of parameters.  Apparently this won't work with autoconf2.13
>>>and
>>>similar.
>>
>>Um, I'm wrong.  I don't know where the second AC_LIB_ARG_WITH is coming
>>from.  Can you tell me more about your syetem (autoconf version,
>>contents of acinclude.m4 and aclocal.m4)?
> 
> 
> Autoconf is 2.13, see above. I attach two files.

Hey, I can duplicate this using autoconf2.13 as well!

AC_LIB_ARG_WITH is defined in acinclude.m4.  I don't know where the 
second definition is coming from.  There is already special handling to 
differentiate 2.13 from 2.5x, so you'd think they would have caught this.

jason




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]