Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2003:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2876) Consolidated nations class/legend and update 		Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2876) Consolidated nations class/legend and update

[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: esr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2876) Consolidated nations class/legend and updates patch
From: "esr@xxxxxxxxxxx via RT" <rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:45:14 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
nath@xxxxxxxx via RT <rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Why do you move Angrenost to Mordor? As it is just another name for
> Isengard, I think it should belong to the same country.

Because the Mordor location list is really "Evil places of Middle-Earth", 
and needed more members a lot more than the Numenor list did.

> Why is Ireland historical instead of modern?

Because all the leaders are historical/legendary.  Admittedly this could
have gone the other way.
 
> Good adding of cities, but why Angrenost, Orthanc and Moontower?

Moontower was a poetic name of Minas Ithil.  For the others, see above.
 
> Shouldn't [Scotland] be historical instead of modern?

Yes, it should.  Good catch.  I'll fix that in my next patch.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]