Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: December 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2533) unification of move_unit_map_canvas
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2533) unification of move_unit_map_canvas

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#2533) unification of move_unit_map_canvas
From: "Jason Short via RT" <rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:03:17 -0800
Reply-to: rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 05:01, Raimar Falke via RT wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:28:34PM -0800, Jason Short via RT wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 14:19, Raimar Falke via RT wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:12:47AM -0800, Jason Short via RT wrote:

> > > The patch ok except one thing: what is the propose of
> > > single_tile_pixmap_width? Why was it added? Why do you use it?
> > 
> > single_tile_pixmap_width/single_tile_pixmap_height are currently used as
> > the width and height of the single_tile_pixmap pixmap (which is a
> > secondary backing store used only for animations).  But these are always
> > UNIT_TILE_WIDTH/UNIT_TILE_HEIGHT, so there's not much reason for their
> > existence.
> 
> So I replace their usage in the patch with
> UNIT_TILE_WIDTH/UNIT_TILE_HEIGHT.

This is confusing!  They should either be used consistently or removed.

jason




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]