[Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:31:38PM -0800, Paul Zastoupil wrote:
> Meanwhile, Vasco pointed out that if we're moving away from UDP, we'll
> be using a blocking TCP connection. How do people feel about having
> this blocking process in the server? Should we remain UDP?
Why would it need to block?
If all else fails, we can use a slave process just to send the updates.
--
Reinier
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, Raimar Falke, 2002/11/02
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 2002/11/02
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, Reinier Post, 2002/11/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, Peter Dam Mains, 2002/11/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, Paul Zastoupil, 2002/11/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, Paul Zastoupil, 2002/11/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul,
Reinier Post <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 2002/11/06
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, Ben Webb, 2002/11/07
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: RFC Metaserver overhaul, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 2002/11/07
|
|