[Freeciv-Dev] Re: client option change callback (PR#1935)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Jason Short wrote:
> I've also changed the struct initializers to the "new" (C99?) format,
> which is far more readible IMO. Feel free to change the indentation as
> you like...
I want a decision on this. Is this C99 behaviour portable and acceptable
style?
ie
+#define GEN_INT_OPTION(oname, desc) \
+ { name: #oname, \
+ description: desc, \
+ type: COT_INT, \
+ p_int_value: &oname, \
+ p_bool_value: NULL, \
+ p_string_value: NULL, \
+ string_length: 0, \
+ change_callback: NULL, \
+ p_string_vals: NULL, \
+ p_gui_data: NULL \
+ }
- Per
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: client option change callback (PR#1935),
Per I. Mathisen <=
|
|