[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [IAMBACK] [PATCH] [1.3] cleanup of proccess_*_want() (
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
--- Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 03:17:26AM CEST, I got a letter,
> where Raahul Kumar <raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx> told me, that...
> + if (unit_type_flag(unit_type, F_IGTER)) {
> + /* Not quite right... */
> + /* TODO: Use something like IGTER_MOVE_COST. -- Raahul */
> + move_rate *= SINGLE_MOVE;
> + }
>
> + if (unit_types[unit_type].move_type == LAND_MOVING) {
> + if (boatspeed > 0) {
> + /* It's either city or too far away, so don't bother with
> + * victim_move_rate. */
> + move_time = (warmap.cost[boatx][boaty] + move_rate - 1) /
> move_rate
> + + 1 + warmap.seacost[x][y] / boatspeed; /* kludge
> */
> + if (unit_type_flag(unit_type, F_MARINES)) move_time -= 1;
> +
> + } else if (warmap.cost[x][y] <= move_rate) {
> + /* It's adjacent. */
> + move_time = 1;
> +
> + } else {
>
>
> I'm everytime puzzled with those dramatical mysterious pauses.. like you
> wanted to say something, then changed your mind.. ;)
I didn't add those mysterious pauses. That not quite right bit is a Syelism.
<snip>
> > > All of my complaints are about your comments which is non-essential.
> > > I haven't checked line-by-line correspondence but if you run a few
> > > autogames, I think the patch can be safely committed and human resources
> > > directed to pastures new (like the dreaded and bugged f_s_t_k).
> >
> > Not the f_s_t_k. Anything but that. What have I done to deserve this?
>
> Muahahahaha >:).
>
> Don't fear, we'll shield you..
I'm having flasbacks to 'Nam. This is cruel and unusual punishment. You are all
in violation of the Geneva Convention.
Crew: Should I send in Readme.AI minus Per's diplomacy bits today, or wait till
later?
Aloha,
RK.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [IAMBACK] [PATCH] [1.3] cleanup of proccess_*_want() (PR#1295), (continued)
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [IAMBACK] [PATCH] [1.3] cleanup of proccess_*_want() (PR#1295),
Raahul Kumar <=
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [IAMBACK] [PATCH] [1.3] cleanup of proccess_*_want() (PR#1295), Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/04/08
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [IAMBACK] [PATCH] [1.3] cleanup of proccess_*_want() (PR#1295), Gregory Berkolaiko, 2002/04/08
|
|