[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] Fixing Warriors (PR#1351)

[Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:31:26PM +0100, Reinier Post wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:28:00AM -0800, Raahul Kumar wrote:
> 
> > The transitive function does make sense, and Reinier and I have already
> > discussed it. The only question, and this is a very important question, is
> > who's going to implement it? I'm too busy with the AI to bother with ruleset
> > stuff. No one else is even interested. If you want a transitive tech tree
> > parser, Christian, it's up to you.
> 
> Or to me.  You're absolutely right.

> However, the parser won't change.  After parsing, a function would be
> invoked that applies its transitive closure.  A function to compute
> it was added just one month ago, so this should be straightforward.

Why do we need to change the parsing code? Can't these changes be made
by "hand" in the ruleset? Some kind of pre-calculation?!

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "Real Users find the one combination of bizarre
   input values that shuts down the system for days."