Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: your mail
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: your mail

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Kaufman <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Raahul Kumar <raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx>, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: your mail
From: Raahul Kumar <raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 20:39:03 -0800 (PST)

--- Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> 
> > Bcc: 
> > Subject: Re: [Freeciv-Dev] New AI cleanups (jitterbug spam)
> > Reply-To: 
> > In-Reply-To:
> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203231519490.5577-100000@localhost.localdomain>; from
> Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 03:26:55PM +0000
> > 
> > stop spamming jitterbug. there are already 3 PR entries for this when there
> 
> > should be one. whatever you guys are doing, you're doing it wrong.
> 
> I was just replying to Raahul's email.
> I don't know what Raahul did, he probably sent his email to freeciv and 
> cc'ed it to bugs, which usually has such side effects.
> 

Yes exactly. I apologise for all the spam. It's just that other people on the
list have reported difficulties just sending cc'ed  to bugs patches before.


> Shouldn't we standardize the procedure?  And please describe in the 
> website what you expect and what you _don't_ expect people to do.
> 
> My suggestion is:
> 1. Small patches / bugfixes should be sent to bugs as attachments
> 2. Big patches should be uploaded to incoming with a description sent to 
> bugs.
> 3. Do_not_ cc your email to freeciv-dev, the system will do it for you and 
> will do properly.
> 

It will never happen again.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]