Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: March 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: your mail
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: your mail

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Mike Kaufman <kaufman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Raahul Kumar <raahul_da_man@xxxxxxxxx>, <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: your mail
From: Gregory Berkolaiko <Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 19:24:50 +0000 (GMT)

On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Mike Kaufman wrote:

> Bcc: 
> Subject: Re: [Freeciv-Dev] New AI cleanups (jitterbug spam)
> Reply-To: 
> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203231519490.5577-100000@localhost.localdomain>; 
> from Gregory.Berkolaiko@xxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 03:26:55PM +0000
> 
> stop spamming jitterbug. there are already 3 PR entries for this when there 
> should be one. whatever you guys are doing, you're doing it wrong.

I was just replying to Raahul's email.
I don't know what Raahul did, he probably sent his email to freeciv and 
cc'ed it to bugs, which usually has such side effects.

However I must point out, that on www.freeciv.org there is no 
systematic description of how the patches should be submitted.
        http://www.freeciv.org/contribute.html#Submit
says that they should be sent to freeciv-dev
        http://www.freeciv.org/cgi-bin/bugs
says "you can also submit patches by sending email to bugs@...)

Shouldn't we standardize the procedure?  And please describe in the 
website what you expect and what you _don't_ expect people to do.

My suggestion is:
1. Small patches / bugfixes should be sent to bugs as attachments
2. Big patches should be uploaded to incoming with a description sent to 
bugs.
3. Do_not_ cc your email to freeciv-dev, the system will do it for you and 
will do properly.




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]