[Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 11:01 am, Reinier Post wrote:
> There are many exits in the code; you have to restructure the code
> everywhere to make everything pass on the failure values and clean up
> the allocated memory as appropriate. The joys of C.
i've always hated writing error handling. it's just not fun and not very
interesting. it's not just C. it's everywhere.
> Now the ruleset format is undocumented and inadequate - it doesn't really
> support nested structures. So perhaps it's better to use libxml2?
> libxml2 depends on libm (which Freeciv doesn't depend on I think)
> and libz, which Freeciv depends on for compression, but nothing else.
not a bad idea. although, for the life of me, i can't imagine what xml needs
a math library for. oh... floating point. never mind. all xml configuration
would be pretty nice.
andy
- [Freeciv-Dev] registry, Andrew Sutton, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Reinier Post, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Petr Baudis, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Andrew Sutton, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Jules Bean, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Reinier Post, 2001/12/05
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: do you really want to work on the ~ (was: registry), Gregor Zeitlinger, 2001/12/05
|
|