Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: October 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Split patch (was Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs) 		Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Split patch (was Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs)

[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "Ross W. Wetmore" <rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx (Freeciv developers)
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Split patch (was Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs)
From: Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 09:30:48 +0200 
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:51:10PM -0400, Ross W. Wetmore wrote:
> But I think it has been said many times that such flexibility is not
> required for Freeciv. It would be a wise move to really look at the
> pros and cons before introducing such parse elements into any future 
> command syntax design.

I agree, neither the ; or the ability to let commands continue on the
next line seem required.  It's just nice to have.

-- 
Reinier
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]