Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: September 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Freeciv Developers <freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [RFC PATCH] init_techs
From: Arien Malec <arien_malec@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:38:00 -0700 (PDT)

--- Daniel L Speyer <dspeyer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree here.  There may be functions which take a variable number of
> arguments (e.g. /givetech nation tech1 tech2 ...)  If the command parser
> tries to parse too intelligently, it'll just get in the way of
> unanticipated syntaxes.

Again, my point is that there should be *a standard syntax* that is supported
and enforced by the framework. If you need to extend the syntax, you extend the
framework *once*. Otherwise, you have scores of callbacks with scores of
nonstandard syntaxes, and the poor user has to remember just which syntax a
certain command provides.

Arien 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. 
http://im.yahoo.com


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]