Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: User-Agent for the Client
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: User-Agent for the Client

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Andreas Kemnade <akemnade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gaute B Strokkenes <gs234@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Zastoupil <paulz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: User-Agent for the Client
From: Paul Zastoupil <paulz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:23:28 -0700

On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:00:47AM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Gaute B Strokkenes writes:
>  > On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, akemnade@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>  > > Paul Zastoupil writes:
>  > >  > On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 04:05:11PM -0700, Paul Zastoupil wrote:
>  > >  > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 03:57:37PM -0700, Paul Zastoupil wrote:
>  > >  > > > Having a look at all the /metaserver/ requests on the Freeciv
>  > >  > > > webserver, I thought it would be nice to know where those are
>  > >  > > > coming from.
>  > >  > > > 
>  > >  > > > I propose the following patch:
>  > >  > > > 
>  > >  > > 
>  > >  > > Ugh, portablility strikes again....
>  > >  > > 
>  > >  > > Someone please check, I don't really know what I am doing in
>  > >  > > the second half.
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > And according to RFC 1945 it should be Product/version....
>  > > You have three times the string "User-Agent: Freeciv.."
>  > > One does not contain the slash. To avoid such typos
>  > > I suggest to use a my_snprintf to fill a buffer and send it then.
>  > > I have tested the following patch with and without HAVE_FDOPEN.
>  > 
>  > It would be nice to have it add "client" there somewhere too.
>  > 
> Do you mean simply add the word "client" or mention if it was a gtk
> client, or a xaw client, etc?

Now _that_ would be useful ;)

-- 
Paul Zastoupil


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]