[Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 02:52:12PM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Thue wrote:
> > The argument that was brought up against a QT client the last time this
> > came up was that it would too much trouble to maintain (more copies of
> > client code always adds some initia), and that the KDe users could just
> > use the gtk client.
>
> Someone actually did a QT port of the client a while back. I think it was the
> first client port to something other than Xaw, unless you count my port to
> Xaw3d. I don't think they ever actually finished with it.
I didn't know that - do you have any leads? We could mention it
on the site to feed to people who ask for a KDE port :-)
> People bitched about QT not being under the GPL.
OK, that was a problem, but it has been resolved. I think portability
was the first issue. Freeciv was started in C because it was
considered more portable than C++. The Xaw client is being maintained
for the reason that Xaw was more widely available than GTK+. This has
changed now.
--
Reinier
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, (continued)
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/08/08
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Trent Piepho, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Greg Wooledge, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Trent Piepho, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Arien Malec, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Andreas Kemnade, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, SamBC, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Trent Piepho, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Grzegorz Borowiak, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?,
Reinier Post <=
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa, 2001/08/08
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Mika Korhonen, 2001/08/09
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: KCiv?, Gaute B Strokkenes, 2001/08/09
|
|