Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: May 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] _final_ *snprintf cleanup. (PR#774)
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] _final_ *snprintf cleanup. (PR#774)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Gaute B Strokkenes <gs234@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] _final_ *snprintf cleanup. (PR#774)
From: Thue <thue@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 00:41:43 +0200

On Saturday 19 May 2001 11:41, Gaute B Strokkenes wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2001, thue@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > You define a function AC_FUNC_VSNPRINTF. That should probably be
> > FC_FUNC_VSNPRINTF like the other native freeciv functions.
>
> I did it like that because I'm going to submit it to the GNU Autoconf
> archive as soon as I finish my finals.  Most of the other functions
> you can find there are named like that.  Feel free to change it to
> whatever you feel like for the purposes of Freeciv, up to and
> including AC_HOLGER_DANSKE ;-)
>
> > Just curious, why not conform to the newer C99 standard?

Shouldn't the code be added to acinclude.m4 and not aclocal.m4? If we put it 
in aclocal.m4 we have to manually put it back in every time we have run 
aclocal, if I understand it correctly.
Ok, that won't be a problem if it makes it into the official autoconf, but 
that is first at some point in the future.

-Thue


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]