[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (no subject)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
[I've moved all "philosophical" matters off-list]
[...]
> one. I think the amount of expirience should only relate to stats (including
> expirience) of a defeated unit. There should also be a possibility for a
> defeated
> but not destroyed unit (see thread on retreating) to get some expirience.
Oh, yes. But it would be complex to implement. In the end, you need
the answer to this question: how good was the unit you've been fighting
against, relative to your own power, all factors counted? I think the
hp you've lost in the battle is a good approximation of it.
If you accept the fact that the experience of a unit is a raw number
(instead of a complete skill list) you need to know only that.
If someone implements retreating, the defeated unit will get xp the same
way.
[...]
> >Anyway, since I'm in favour of a tunable parameter for this,
> >you may just choose a different setting for your games B-).
>
> Now this is a matter of its own. Should you have a different setting for every
> detail? Personally, I'm in favour of a few various set of rules, but not too
> many. Because if you *can* change every parameter independant of others, then
> it just becomes a matter of how good are you at this particular setting, are
> you used to it and how much do you have to adjust to it in relation to the
> settings
> you usually play with...
As I said in the private answer, there are already a lot of parameters
that affect gameplay: generator, number of resources, etc... as long as
the standard values will be the current ones, I think there're no big
problems in adding new options (or rules).
>
> Huh... A long response... But an interesting discussion, for me at least :)
> Greetings.
>
> --
> Besplatni e-mail - http://www.iskon.hr/mail/
>
>
>
>
.TM.
--
____/ ____/ /
/ / / Marco Colombo
___/ ___ / / Technical Manager
/ / / ESI s.r.l.
_____/ _____/ _/ Colombo@xxxxxx
|
|
