Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: April 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: rja@xxxxxxxxxxx, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Civil Disorder or CIVIL DISORDER?
From: Reinier Post <rp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:30:50 +0200

On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 02:27:14PM +1000, Richard Atkins wrote:
> The messages from the server are incosistent when civil disorder starts in
> a city, and when it is continuing.
> Game: Civil disorder in %s
> Since under a Democracy, even one turn of disorder can cause anarchy,

Can it, really?

> should the first message be in all caps (easier to spot in the message
> dialog), or should the second be lower case too (meaning I should look
> even closer at the messages that scroll by)?

I don't think so.  The code seems to follow what I inferred from the
existing messages, namely, that one turn of civil disorder doesn't cause
anarchy.  Democracy would be practically unplayable without this rule.


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]