[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [FreeCiv-Cvs] vasc: Added gtk+ resource file for the c
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: |
freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Subject: |
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [FreeCiv-Cvs] vasc: Added gtk+ resource file for the client. |
From: |
Vasco Alexandre Da Silva Costa <vasc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Mar 2000 14:56:17 +0000 (WET) |
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, David Pfitzner wrote:
(snip...)
> Good, but I'm wondering if we should rationalize the locations
> of the config files somewhat. We currently have:
>
> ~/.civclientrc common options for all clients
> ~/Freeciv Xaw resources file
> ~/freeciv.rc Gtk+ resources file
> ~/.freeciv/ In default FREECIV_PATH, eg for rulesets, tilesets.
>
> Or maybe this is ok, if the toolkit-specific files follow the
> conventions for those toolkits? (Eg, I'm not sure we can even
> change ~/Freeciv for Xaw resources?) But I would prefer
> clientrc be moved into ~/.freeciv/ (and ideally we would also
> have a server rc file, planned for some time but not implemented
> yet).
About Xaw resources i don't know, but as far as i can tell Gtk+ has no
conventions on that. We can change the directory for the Gtk+ resource
files to ~/.freeciv/freeciv.rc or maybe ~/.freeciv/civclient.rc. What do
you think?
> Another issue: we currently keep an autogenerated copy of
> client/gui-xaw/Freeciv.h in CVS; do we also want the new
> client/gui-gtk/Freeciv.h in CVS? Recall we keep autogenerated
> files in CVS for the benefit of people who may not have all the
> tools. In this case the only relevant tool seems to be 'sed',
> which configure etc rely on anyway, so maybe we need neither
> in CVS?
If that's the case, IMO both files should be removed from CVS.
BTW the changes i made to the ad2c script seem to work, but i really dunno
much about sed besides the s// command :-)
---
Vasco Alexandre da Silva Costa @ Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa
|
|