Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: February 2000:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Freeciv] Re: Freeciv goals
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Freeciv] Re: Freeciv goals

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Lalo Martins <lalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv@xxxxxxxxxxx, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Freeciv] Re: Freeciv goals
From: Paul Zastoupil <paulz@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:38:50 -0800

Lalo Martins wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 02:07:02PM -0500, Mike Jing wrote:
> > >
> > I assume that would have to happen once we reach 2.0?  At the moment there
> > are still a few important features missing, such as true diplomacy and the
> > senate (what else in Civ2 that Freeciv still doesn't have?
> 
> So perhaps development should _focus_ on these two goals, so
> that we can get to 2.0 once and for all and be free from the
> PayCiv compatibility burden?
> 
> But how do you focus a group of voluntaries?
> 
> I hereby announce that the priority for Freeciv development is
> implementing True Diplomacy (TM) and The Senate (TM). People
> who want a Freeciv or CTP mode should pool their ideas.
> 
> Then I propose we make a 1.11 release when both these goals are
> there, at least experimentally, and then 1.12 when we feel they
> are stable.
> 
> After that, polishing, and 2.0 can claim full Civ2
> compatibility, plus it'll be the first version to feature the
> first steps on Freeciv mode.
> 
> Is that fine for most people?
> 

For any of this to matter we need to have Jeff and Tony in on the
discussion.

David, we wouldn't mind your input either ;)

-- 
Paul Zastoupil



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]
  • [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Freeciv] Re: Freeciv goals, Paul Zastoupil <=