[Freeciv-Dev] AI
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Isn't the AI already advanced enought to stop being omniscient?
I feel quite "cheated on" by the omniscience, because it has
some collateral effects...
1: I usually spend the first few turns (and militar units I
eventually get from huts) exploring the world; the AI doesn't
need that and sends any military units right away to my cities
2: In the rare case when I can make a game against AI last, it
doesn't have to waste resources and research in Apollo etc
3: I have a real problem with mapping AI's territory, as it
always sends troops to kill my explores straight out; OTOH, it
already knows where all my cities are and what are the ones more
worth attacking (doesn't it know what is the capital too?)
I believe a non-omniscient (probably something you could set on
and off in the server, like difficulty - "omnisc Caesar") would
be a cooler alternative to newbies than "easy", as it would be
more realistic in teaching how to really play.
[]s,
|alo
+----
--
I am Lalo of deB-org. You will be freed.
Resistance is futile.
http://www.webcom.com/lalo mailto:lalo@xxxxxxxxxx
pgp key in the web page
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
- [Freeciv-Dev] AI,
Lalo Martins <=
|
|