[aclug-L] Re: Slow drive sections
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
I think that the proper answer to this argument is along the lines of:
* It depends.
and
* Use your best judgment.
Here is some reading that may enlight everybody though:
The ZCAV program which I initially released as a separate package tests
the performance of different zones of a hard drive. It does not write
any data (so you can use it on full file systems). It can show why
comparing the speed of Windows at the start of a hard drive to Linux at
the end of the hard drive (typical dual-boot scenario) isn't a valid
comparison.
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/zcav/
--
Arnold Cavazos, Jr. abcjr@xxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0600, Carl D Cravens wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Jeff Vian wrote:
>
> > speed of access, related to seek time.
> > on an average, sectors located near the spindle are faster to access
> > than sectors located near the outer edge.
>
> Why is this the case? I don't see anything in the physical construction
> of the drive that would cause access to sectors at the edge of the disk to
> be slower than access near the spindle. Especially at any noticeable
> level.
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
|
|