Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: October 2001:
[aclug-L] Re: filesystems (was Re: MTAs & maildir vs mbox)
Home

[aclug-L] Re: filesystems (was Re: MTAs & maildir vs mbox)

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: <discussion@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: filesystems (was Re: MTAs & maildir vs mbox)
From: "Ryan Hunt" <rhunt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 13:56:49 -0500
Reply-to: discussion@xxxxxxxxx

heh, I must be psychic.. I was writing the response as u were sending this
:-)

-Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Hall" <jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <discussion@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: filesystems (was Re: MTAs & maildir vs mbox)


>
> > Large mbox mailboxes are huge, unwieldy files. Large maildir mailboxes
> > are huge, unwieldy directories--most filesystems don't handle them
> > efficiently after they grow to a few thousand files.
>
> Okay... along those lines... which filesystem(s) ARE good at handling
large
> numbers of files in a single directory?
>
> What other considerations should be taken into account when choosing a
> filesystem--specifically one for a (ponentially large and heavily used)
mail
> spool?
>
> -- Jonathan
>
>
> --
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>   Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx  *  PGP public key available
>  Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (620) 367-2487
>          http://www.futureks.net/  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
>                   -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux  =-
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>

-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]