[aclug-L] Re: Denied connections
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
I've had the same IP address since July 26 and I turned the modem off for a week
while we went to Colorado week before last.
bruce
Ironrose wrote:
> I have been told that that is true. There are more users than they have
> IP addresses, that is why they use dynamic IP's, rather than static
> IP's. They scan to see if someone is using the modem, and if they are
> not, the IP address is given to someone else. This allows more people
> to use the KS cable with less expense. This doesn't happen very often
> any more since KS cable bought more IP addresses. This is the story I
> was given in my NT and Internet classes @ Butler. :-}
>
> David Carmichael wrote:
> >
> > I do not know if the local RoadRunner Service does this.... But I heard on
> > "The Screen Savers" (TechTV) that some cable modem systems will ping
> > connected modems to know if they need to keep the reserved IP address open
> > or if they can reassign it to some other users system.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bruce Bales" <bbales@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <discussion@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 7:29 PM
> > Subject: [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections
> >
> > >
> > > Yes, most of mine are ports 80 and 139, with an occasional 27374.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the explanation, James. Makes sense and now I feel more
> > secure. Also,
> > > telnet is turned off by the stock Frazierwall.
> > > bruce
> > >
> > > james l wrote:
> > >
> > > > Root/Great Overall Dictator replies:
> > > > > I've been leaving my Frazierwall firewall turned on 24/7 for several
> > days. It
> > > > > has been denying about 200 hits each 24 hours. In the 24 hours
> > between about
> > > > > 0600 yesterday and 0600 today, I got almost 650 hits denied. Kinda
> > makes me
> > > > > wonder what was going on before I got the wall up.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Lots of the same here, mostly on port 80(http) (code red anyone?)
> > > > and a few on port 139 (smb).
> > > >
> > > > > A related question; What keeps someone from breaking in on one of the
> > ports that
> > > > > is not denied by the firewall?
> > > > > bruce
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Essentially each connection opens a 'tunnel' to the outside and if the
> > packet
> > > > is not sent as a response over one of these tunnels, it denys the
> > packet.
> > > > Unless, you specifically allow access to say port 80 (forewared to
> > another
> > > > machine), then there might be some problems.
> > > >
> > > > James L.
> > > > -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
> > > > visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
> > >
> > > -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
> > > visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
> > visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
> visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, (continued)
- Message not available
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, John Reinke, 2001/08/28
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, Greg House, 2001/08/27
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, gLaNDix, 2001/08/27
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, Ironrose, 2001/08/27
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, Bruce Bales, 2001/08/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, David Carmichael, 2001/08/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, Ironrose, 2001/08/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections,
Bruce Bales <=
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, Chris Owen, 2001/08/26
- [aclug-L] Re: Denied connections, Ironrose, 2001/08/26
|
|