Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: June 1999:
RE: [aclug-L] June 15 meeting
Home

RE: [aclug-L] June 15 meeting

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: "'aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [aclug-L] June 15 meeting
From: "Clint A. Brubakken" <cabrubak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:10:30 -0500 (CDT)
Reply-to: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx

From 2.0.x to 2.2.x there are a lot, some of the ones I like smb file
system support, better plug-n-play, better-scsi

upgrading from 2.2.9 to 2.2.10 was mainly because of a bug in 2.2.9 could
cause a DOS (Denial of Service) Attack. 


Clint Brubakken
Computer Science Services Group, LLC
Wichita, KS
cabrubak@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Now payink attention, please.  This is mouse.  Click-click. Easy to 
use, da? Now you try...
                                        -- Pitr to Miranda
User Friendly, 10/11/1998

On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, mike holmes wrote:

> what are the advantages of upgrading to the new kernels?  I upgraded to the 
> 6.0 so I could have the new gnome.  I do not know what I got with the 
> kernel upgrade
> 
> mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clint A. Brubakken [SMTP:cabrubak@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 10:15 AM
> To:   'aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject:      RE: [aclug-L] June 15 meeting
> 
> Its the middle number that determines wether its stable or unstable, the
> last just determines the rev, or patch number ie
> I upgraded from 2.0.35 to 2.2.9, a couple weeks ago. Yesterday I d/l the
> newest kernel (actually just patched 2.2.9 to bring it up)  2.2.10. The
> newest unstable is 2.3.6 or there abouts.
> 
> 
> 
> Clint Brubakken
> Computer Science Services Group, LLC
> Wichita, KS
> cabrubak@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> "There are a billion people in China. And I want them to be able to pass 
> notes
> to each other written in Perl. I want them to be able to write poetry in 
> Perl.
> 
> That is my vision of the Future. My chosen perspective."
> 
>   -- Larry Wall (Open Sources, 1999 O'Reilly and Associates)
> 
> On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, mike holmes wrote:
> 
> > I thought the odd numbers were unstable kernals?  Or, not proven to be 
> stable would be a better way of saying it.
> >
> > mike
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       spiff [SMTP:spiff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent:       Monday, June 14, 1999 7:10 PM
> > To: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject:    [aclug-L] june 15 meeting
> >
> > Hey, ya know I could volunteer a (debian)box with kernel 2.0.36 on it to 
> be
> > upgraded to 2.2.5 or higher if you would like...
> >
> >
> > *the catch is ya have to figure out my ppp in the process :)
> >
> >
> > ttyl,
> > spiff
> > 
> 


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]