RE: [aclug-L] June 15 meeting

["Clint A. Brubakken" <cabrubak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Its the middle number that determines wether its stable or unstable, the
last just determines the rev, or patch number ie
I upgraded from 2.0.35 to 2.2.9, a couple weeks ago. Yesterday I d/l the
newest kernel (actually just patched 2.2.9 to bring it up)  2.2.10. The
newest unstable is 2.3.6 or there abouts. 



Clint Brubakken
Computer Science Services Group, LLC
Wichita, KS
cabrubak@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---
"There are a billion people in China. And I want them to be able to pass notes 
to each other written in Perl. I want them to be able to write poetry in Perl. 

That is my vision of the Future. My chosen perspective."

  -- Larry Wall (Open Sources, 1999 O'Reilly and Associates)

On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, mike holmes wrote:

> I thought the odd numbers were unstable kernals?  Or, not proven to be stable 
> would be a better way of saying it.
> 
> mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spiff [SMTP:spiff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 7:10 PM
> To:   aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:      [aclug-L] june 15 meeting
> 
> Hey, ya know I could volunteer a (debian)box with kernel 2.0.36 on it to be
> upgraded to 2.2.5 or higher if you would like...
> 
> 
> *the catch is ya have to figure out my ppp in the process :)
> 
> 
> ttyl,
> spiff
>