Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: March 1999:
Re: [aclug-L] Is RPM easy?
Home

Re: [aclug-L] Is RPM easy?

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [aclug-L] Is RPM easy?
From: j m wagle <jmwagle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:58:33 +0000
Reply-to: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Jeff: thanks for the response,

This solution has rpm actually install the netscape, I was wondering
if it is possible to "trick" rpm by only changing the rpm data base
-- but I guess not.  It is a thought though, to update a '.spec'
file for uninstall, and update but not actually 'installing' the
application with the rpm...  What do you think?

thanks again,

mike wagle

Jeff wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, j m wagle wrote:
> 
> > I have installed redhat 5.2, but I did not install netscape, rather
> > I used the 'tar ball' and installed netscape communicator 5.1.
> >
> > my question,  can I now let RPM 'know' that netscape communicator
> > 5.1 is now installed?
> 
> [ This is from memory ]
> 
> 1) cp netscape-communicator-5.1.tar.gz /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES
> 2) make a netscape-communicator-5.1-1.spec file in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS
> 3) cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS; rpm -ba netscape-communicator-5.1-1.spec
> 4) cd ../RPMS; rpm -Uvh netscape-communicator-5.1-1
> 
> The .spec file has a certain format; if you can find some other rpms (like
> a previous netscape one) then you can copy it & modify for netscape 5.1.
> Otherwise use anything ya got and make it work.  For the %files part, you
> want to include anything and everything that the nsinstall script installs
> (docs, binaries, config files).
> 
> -jeff
---
This is the Air Capital Linux Users Group discussion list.  If you
want to unsubscribe, send the word "unsubscribe" to
aclug-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx.  If you want to post to the list, send your
message to aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx.



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]