[aclug-L] Re: Fw: Samba must die (fwd)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
After posting the message on "Samba must die" yesterday, I find this
rebuttal of the validity of the message...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 12:20:51 +0100 (BST)
From: Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linux Admin List <linux-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bharat Linux Users Group <blug-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fw: Samba must die (fwd)
Oommen Thomas wrote:
> MS is now trying to kill Samba!
This was discussed on slashdot.org a few weeks ago. The general
consensus was that Cringely's article was nonsense.
Changing the default configuration to use encrypted passwords is
entirely sensible. Recent versions of Samba support encrypted
passwords as standard (older versions required that the DES support
was added separately, due to US encryption regulations).
A number of people pointed out the the articles which had supposedly
disappeared from Microsoft's knowledge base were still there (URLs
Find the original thread on slashdot.org if you want more details.
Glynn Clements <glynn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is the Air Capitol Linux Users Group discussion list. If you
want to unsubscribe, send the word "unsubscribe" to
aclug-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx. If you want to post to the list, send your
message to aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx.
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- [aclug-L] Re: Fw: Samba must die (fwd),
Dale W Hodge <=