[linux-help] Re: security list
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:46:16PM -0500, M. Osten wrote:
> Bugtraq is heavily moderated and censored (due to corporate interests),
> so I wouldn't call it a "good" list.
Sometimes I want a moderated and censored list. If you want to find out
about patches for software you run and some security headlines, it's a good
place to be.
> A better list is Netsys's "Full Disclosure" list. Be prepared for the
> usual flame-wars, and retarded banter, but also be prepared to be very
> disturbed by the general lack of security in all software. "Full
> Disclosure" usually has "0 day" bulitins and exploit code before anyone
> else (and usually before the vendor even has been contacted).
I've found that full disclosure has such a low signal-to-noise ratio that
it's nearly useless. I don't care about exploit code except perhaps to
verify that a fix has worked, so that's no extra benefit for me.
-- This is the linux-help@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
|
|