| [linux-help] Re: Keeping a process alive[Top] [All Lists][Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
 
 Same here... I've found it to be pretty stable.  I don't use it all that
much; I just play around with it once in a while when I feel like learning a
little more about it.
Thanks for the reply, Bruce
--John
----- Original Message -----
From: "bruce" <bbales@xxxxxxx>
To: <linux-help@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 7:09 PM
Subject: [linux-help] Re: Keeping a process alive
> On Monday 28 April 2003 08:09 am, you wrote:
> > Hello, all!
> >
> > Just for fun, I've set up my Linux RH 7.2 (I know... I should
> > upgrade) box  ..............
>
> I am not in a hurry to upgrade my RH7.2 box right now.  It has been
> doing pretty well for over a year.  I have been monitoring the
> KDE-Linux newsgroup for quite a while and they seem to be having quite
> a few problems with KDE3 and RH8.x.  Probably my only good reason to
> upgrade would be to get a whole new set of upgraded applications.
>
> bruce
> -- This is the linux-help@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>
-- This is the linux-help@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
 
 
[linux-help] Keeping a process alive, John Lucas, 2003/04/28
[linux-help] Re: Keeping a process alive, flimzy, 2003/04/28
[linux-help] Re: Keeping a process alive, Nate Bargmann, 2003/04/28
[linux-help] Re: Keeping a process alive, Tom Hull, 2003/04/28
[linux-help] Re: Keeping a process alive, bruce, 2003/04/28
[linux-help] Re: Keeping a process alive,
John Lucas <=
[linux-help] Re: Keeping a process alive, John Lucas, 2003/04/28
 
 |  |