[gopher] Can we keep this a gopher list please?

["Andrew Mahan" <mahanam@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why are we talking about FF3 so much when this mailing list is supposed to
invoke gopher-related discussion?  Let's not get hung up on stuff like
this...it's kind of ridiculous if you think about it.

I love to use gopher but I can't stand when this list gets off topic...

-Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: gopher-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gopher-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Freddy Cruger
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 1:24 PM
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gopher] Re: Overbite 1424 finally on addons.mozilla.org

Sorry, I sure don't know anything about your experience with Firefox
3.x, maybe you know how to fix all the problems; I only know that FF3 is
one big hole in the system security, and my short experience with FF3
only proves that - in my opinion, FF3 sucks like a turbine, and best
feets to Windows (without firewall or any other security software) than
to a secure operating system like UNIX/Linus operating systems are
considered. However, I don't think that problems all about FF3 should be
discussed in a gopher mailing list any longer, everything required to
understand the subject is already said.=20
Action


=D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 10/09/2009 =D0=B2 13:58 +0200, rachael@telefisk.=
org =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
>=20
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Freddy Cruger wrote:
>=20
> > Thank you for the link, however, I'd like to warn one more time: using
> > Firefox 3 is not good for security reasons. On the other side, isn't
> > console better?
>=20
> Would be nice if you could provied some insight as to why firefox 3.x is =
a=20
> problem. Other than the issue with using css to track down what sites=20
> people have been visiting, I aint aware of any major issues with it, that=
=20
> can not be defused by noscript.
>=20
> regards Jacob Dahl Pind
>=20



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4415 (20090910) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4415 (20090910) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com