[gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
I am not qualified. I defer to the other more qualified persons who
inhabit this mailinglist.
--- On Fri, 9/5/08, Luke Ingerson <l.ingerson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Luke Ingerson <l.ingerson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, September 5, 2008, 4:41 AM
--On 04 September 2008 13:47 -0700 JumpJet Mailbox
<jumpjetinfo@xxxxxxxxx>=20
wrote:
> Most of those listed
> "clients" however are really multi-protocol http Browsers.=A0 I
really
> don't see any of the dedicated Gopher Clients
So do what Wikipedia wants and participate and put more information on the=20
webpage. Surely having the Gopher entries correct and fully up to date is =
in the best interests of the "gopher community"?
- [gopher] Gopher articles at Wikipedia, Peter Tynan, 2008/09/02
- [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia, Cameron Kaiser, 2008/09/02
- [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia, Peter Tynan, 2008/09/03
- [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia, JumpJet Mailbox, 2008/09/04
- [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia, Peter Tynan, 2008/09/05
- [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia, Luke Ingerson, 2008/09/05
- [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia,
JumpJet Mailbox <=
- [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia, Cameron Kaiser, 2008/09/05
- [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia, Peter Tynan, 2008/09/07
- [gopher] Re: Gopher articles at Wikipedia, Nicholas Shanks, 2008/09/08
|
|