Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: gopher: August 2008:
[gopher] Re: Establishment of .gopher TLD
Home

[gopher] Re: Establishment of .gopher TLD

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gopher] Re: Establishment of .gopher TLD
From: Kyevan <kyevan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:04:46 -0500
Reply-to: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx

"Sites hosted on a .gopher domain should not serve content via any other 
protocol."

What's your reasoning for that? I mean, Gopher should be primary, but I 
don't see an issue with, say, turning on the http access in pygopherd or 
using some other proxy, or running sshd for remote administration, or such.

brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> OpenNIC is an alternative, open, democratic DNS that mirrors the ICANN
> namespace as well as provides namespaces for alternative TLDs.

Except ICANN's .biz, last I looked. This may have changed now that 
PacRoot is dead, though.

Matthew Holevinski wrote:
 > Honestly I think that's a fabulous idea.
 > There's no reason gopher has to be restricted
 > to Gopher://.

Except that whatever:// is actually for the client only, so it knows if 
it needs to send a gopher selectorm http's multitude of headers, 
negotiate an ssh connection, or fire up Unreal Tournament for a 
deathmatch ;)



[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]