Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: gopher: July 2008:
[gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc.
Home

[gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc.

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gopher] Re: meta: item types, etc.
From: "Nuno J. Silva" <nunojsilva@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 16:19:04 +0100
Reply-to: gopher@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 07:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
JumpJet Mailbox <jumpjetinfo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In which platforms does using that approach is unacceptable?
> > Shouldn't upper and lower cases have different charset codes, in
> > any charset that has both?

> DOS, Atari, Windows 3.x, and some others.

MS-DOS uses ASCII, is there any other encoding which is used when using
tools which deal with TCP in DOS?

-- 
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)
LEIC student at Instituto Superior Técnico
Lisbon, Portugal
Homepage: http://njsg.no.sapo.pt/
Gopherspace: gopher://sdf-eu.org/11/users/njsg
Registered Linux User #402207 - http://counter.li.org

-=-=-
...[Linux's] capacity to talk via any medium except smoke signals.
 -- Dr. Greg Wettstein, Roger Maris Cancer Center

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhvkOgACgkQ8uhttueYbMOaKQCghYWE9Ofhcf3XrfshN8iM0KD6
5kMAn3yniBLTXSPSPGeStterUlte99kc
=zP1h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]