[gopher] Re: Process question
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
> I have a process question about gopher, and gophermap specifically. I'm
> tempted to automagically generate a new gophermap whenever I add new
> files/dirs to my gopher root dir. From what I can tell, gophermap is an
> all-or-nothing deal: If you use it, then everything you want accessible
> has to be part of gophermap. If you don't,
> then everything in the gopher root is accessible.
Since bucktooth is the originator of the gophermap 'standard' and since I'm
the originator of bucktooth :-), I feel authoritative enough to say that
your understanding squares with the present implementation.
Now, to be sure, the UMN-style gopher menus should work in the same fashion,
however, if memory serves.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Emulate your heroes, but not if they're dead. ------------------------------
- [gopher] Process question, Brian, 2002/08/06
- [gopher] Re: Process question,
Cameron Kaiser <=
- [gopher] Re: Process question, Aaron J. Angel, 2002/08/07
- [gopher] Re: Process question, John Goerzen, 2002/08/07
- [gopher] remove, Adam Kling, 2002/08/07
- [gopher] Re: remove, John Goerzen, 2002/08/07
- [gopher] Re: remove, MJ Ray, 2002/08/07
- [gopher] Re: remove, MJ Ray, 2002/08/07
- [gopher] Re: remove, John Goerzen, 2002/08/07
- [gopher] Re: remove, MJ Ray, 2002/08/07
|
|