Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: May 2005:
[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#12232) don't allow invasions during peace treaties
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] (PR#12232) don't allow invasions during peace treaties

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#12232) don't allow invasions during peace treaties
From: "Guest" <rt-guest@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 20:11:13 -0700
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx

<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12232 >

> [guest - Tue Mar 01 06:32:56 2005]:
> 
> > Why not have a "passing treaty" that lets units enter your land but
> > not build a city?  This treaty is separate from neutrality, peace or 
> > alliance.
> 
> If units can impose ZoC and get in each others way, then noone is going 
> to agree to a passing treaty.  On the other hand, if they don't then a 
> passing treaty is pretty much the same as an alliance.
> 
> 
Why not simply have server settings or preferably ruleset options to
indicate which type of alliances are alowed for a certain type of game.
That way it becomes a player choice to play a game, where giving rights
of building (and improving) can be granted.
It is of course a matter of trust: you say you're gonna help with the
infrastructure, if you then build permanent bases (fortersesses or even
villages) it could be considered a casus belli (but that weak and
grovelling nation wouldn't dare :P )





[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]
  • [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#12232) don't allow invasions during peace treaties, Guest <=