[Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#5438) Starting position tidbit
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Karen Yeats wrote:
[...]
> I would rather suggest a check against the amount by which dist was
> decreased in create_start_positions. If it dropped 30% from it's original
> values, we can consider forests, 50% -- we will take good hills etc.
> Something along the lines anyway.
>
> G.
Note, hills get a food bonus and are thus equivalent to roadless plains
as starting positions. Forests significantly impact the initial growth
and can be suicide/stagnation starters for AI.
Hills should *always be valid starters, i.e. all food 2 or better tiles.
Only in desperate situations should food 1 tiles be considered.
This makes a better solution than thinking that you understand the ruleset
when it is user configurtable :-).
Cheers,
RossW
=====
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: (PR#5438) Starting position tidbit,
rwetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx <=
|
|