[Freeciv-Dev] Re: detection of "inline" broken (PR#2104)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 01:19:47AM -0700, jdorje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I use Debian Sid. My system:
>
> + checking for autoconf >= 2.52 ... found 2.54, ok.
> + checking for automake >= 1.4 ... found 1.5, ok.
> + checking for xgettext >= 0.10.36 ... found 0.11.5, ok.
> + checking for msgfmt >= 0.10.36 ... found 0.11.5, ok.
>
> for some time now I have been unable to compile either GTK or GTK2
> clients. I hadn't really looked into it since I figured it was a debian
> issue, but now I see otherwise.
>
> It happens because config.h contains
>
> /* Define as `__inline' if that's what the C compiler calls it,
> or to nothing if it is not supported. */
> #define inline
>
> which basically removes the ability to do inlining. This breaks glib,
> whose header files include some "inline" functions and (the part that I
> think breaks) some custom code to properly #define "inline".
>
> When I change the above to
>
> #define inline __inline
>
> compilation works fine.
> So the question is: why is inline incorrectly defined?
Guess: freeciv doesn't need it and glib is the first project which is
used by freeciv which uses inline in an unsecure way. A proper usage
is to not just use "inline" but prepend a string like:
/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:25:# define __STDIO_INLINE inline
/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:27:# define __STDIO_INLINE extern __inline
/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:33:__STDIO_INLINE int
/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:40:__STDIO_INLINE int
...
/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:118:__STDIO_INLINE int
/usr/include/bits/stdio.h:169:#undef __STDIO_INLINE
Raimar
--
email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|