Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: January 2002:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Freeciv-Dev]Re: Usage of PL macro
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Freeciv-Dev]Re: Usage of PL macro

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: matusik_s@xxxxx
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [Freeciv-Dev]Re: Usage of PL macro
From: Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:39:10 +0100
Reply-to: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:03:00AM +0000, matusik_s@xxxxx wrote:
> Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:19:08PM +0100, mateusz stefek wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 02-01-15 at 11:33 Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
> >> >Hi all,
> >> >
> >> >The latest PL_ macro patch adds several new strings to the to be
> >> >translated strings. However, using 'make <lang>.pox' does not 
> reveal these
> >> >strings, causing several untranslated strings in the final 
> products.
> >> >Can someone look into this (perhaps the patch submitter)? I
> >> > tried adding
> >> >'--keyword=PL_' to the Makefile.in.in in .../po, but that proved 
> to be too
> >> >simplistic :-\
> >> 
> >> My original patch changes configure.in
> >> The problem with PL_ keyword is solved in the same way as the 
> problem with Q_
> >> I don't know why that part of patch didn't get into cvs.
> >
> >I forgot to run autoconf. Please retry. Nevertheless have I applied
> >all patches IMHO.
> >
> >     Raimar
> configure.in is _not_ changed, but it should have been done.
> (and my original patch _does_ it)

You are of course correct. Fixed.

> I found few more places to replace with PL_()

Good.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "It is not yet possible to change operating system by writing
  to /proc/sys/kernel/ostype."              sysctl(2) man page


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]