[Freeciv-Dev] Re: having to rerun auto* (was: Compiling latest CVS)
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:57:01PM -0500, Jason Dorje Short wrote:
> Raimar Falke wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 11:44:38AM +0200, Reinier Post wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:33:20AM +0200, Daniel Sjölie wrote:
> > > > On 2001-10-26 10:28:42, Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems that after the latest city dialog patch the CVS code no
> > > > > longer
> > > > > compiles cleanly. It bails out with:
> > > >
> > > > Run "automake; autoconf; ./configure" (or similar)
> > > >
> > > > I suppose this will be done and the resulting changes commited to cvs
> > > > soon...
> >
> > As said before my automake/autoconf changes to much in the files. So
> > I depend on other person to do this.
> >
> > > Would it be possible to do this automatically?
> >
> > I had the remove the Makefile.in changes by hand!
> >
> > > Either before code is checked in, or in the make process?
>
> It is possible to do this "automatically":
>
> - Remove all Makefile.in files and configure. Add these to .cvsignore.
>
> - Create an "autogen.sh" file that runs automake+autoconf+configure.
> This then gets run in place of configure.
>
> The advantage here is that CVS is cleaner (making cvs diffs easier when
> you change file structure) and automake/autoconf updates happen
> automatically (you have to run configure anyway to get new Makefiles).
> The only disadvantage I know of is that you'll have to have automake and
> autoconf installed to be able to compile CVS freeciv
Thats the problem.
> (a "make dist"
> builds the extra files, so it's not a concern there). In projects where
> I've used this system, I have much preferred it.
> The other option as I see it is just to run automake/autoconf
> willy-nilly and accept all the spurious changes. These files aren't an
> important part of the cvs tree anyway, so it shouldn't really be a
> problem.
Possible.
Raimar
--
email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb."
-- Steven M. Haflich
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: topology RFC (again), Reinier Post, 2001/10/26
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: topology RFC (again), Ross W. Wetmore, 2001/10/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: topology RFC (again), Jason Dorje Short, 2001/10/28
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: topology RFC (again), Ross W. Wetmore, 2001/10/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: topology RFC (again), Jason Dorje Short, 2001/10/29
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: topology RFC (again), Ross W. Wetmore, 2001/10/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: topology RFC (again), Jason Dorje Short, 2001/10/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: topology RFC (again), Ross W. Wetmore, 2001/10/30
- [Freeciv-Dev] Re: topology RFC (again), Jason Dorje Short, 2001/10/31
|
|