Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: October 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Freeciv for windows
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: Freeciv for windows

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Andreas Kemnade <akemnade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Zastoupil <paulz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: Freeciv for windows
From: Paul Zastoupil <paulz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:50:41 -0700

On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 10:12:59PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> Paul Zastoupil writes:
>  > On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 05:59:22PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
>  > > Paul Zastoupil writes:
>  > >  > Ok, where is it?  Someone has implimented the metaserver dialog for 
> windows
>  > >  > somewhere.
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > I have this in the logs:
>  > >  > Freeciv/1.12.1-devel gui-xaw CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.3.1(0.38/3/2) [i686]
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > The question I have is.... XAW?!?!
>  > >  > 
>  > > Someone has used all that unix emulation stuff (including X11,
>  > > XServer) for compiling freeciv.
>  > > The client for windows with gtk (the one you can download from the
>  > > freeciv download page) of course has the metaserver dialog.
>  > > The gui-win32 (without gtk, X11, unix emulation) has no metaserver 
> dialog yet.
>  > 
>  > As you can see from the log entry, its a cvs version (1.12.1-devel).  Also
>  > I know it has to be cvs since I did the user-agent patch post 1.12.0.  
>  > 
> Another question: What should the user-agent string from the gui-win32
> client be? (No uname available)
> Replacing the dummy uname stuff with stuff from GetVersionEx?
> That gives (tested with wine) the following strings:
> Win95
> Win98
> Service Pack 6      (from wine -winver nt40)
> Service Pack 2      (from wine -winver nt351)

I thought the cygwin stuff had uname(), maybe we can lift the code from
there?

-- 
Paul Zastoupil


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]