Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: freeciv-dev: August 2001:
[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] gotohand.c unsigned - signed clearup
Home

[Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] gotohand.c unsigned - signed clearup

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: Markus Linnala <maage@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: freeciv-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Freeciv-Dev] Re: [PATCH] gotohand.c unsigned - signed clearup
From: Raimar Falke <hawk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 11:46:42 +0200
Reply-to: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 12:21:19PM +0300, Markus Linnala wrote:
> 
> Clear warnings: 'comparison between signed and unsigned' at
> gotohand.c.

If we start this we may end up doing a lot of changes like this. Style
guide anyone?

Some time ago I also made everything unsigned based on the semantics
of the variable. However I read in some guide that you loose the
ability to detect underruns like in:
  unsigned i=0; // i is always >=0
  ...
  i--;
  ...
  assert(i>0); // this won't work

and also the compiler doesn't catch cases like above although it has
been teached that i is always >=0.

However such changes may be ok for simple for loops.

        Raimar

-- 
 email: rf13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 "Sit, disk, sit. Good boy. Now spin up. Very good. Here's a netscape
  cookie for you. Fetch me some data. Come on, you can do it. No, not that
  data. Bad disk. Bad." 
    -- Calle Dybedahl, alt.sysadmin.recovery


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]