[aclug-L] FW: [webdev] software platform
[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
This is something we've been discussing on WebDev, but I think it affects
all our members and deserves some discussion here.
--dwh
-----Original Message-----
From: webdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:webdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Tom Hull
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:19 PM
To: webdev@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [webdev] software platform
I've been having some private discussions with Dale Hodge about the
relative merits and demerits of the two ACLUG website prototypes:
http://aclug.notwerk.net/ (aka openacs)
http://aclug.neuralmatrix.org/ (aka postnuke)
I've come to the conclusion that the best way to move forward from
this point would be to switch to the postnuke software platform.
My main reasons for this conclusion are:
1) The amount of work needed to get openacs up to an acceptable
level of functionality is significantly greater.
2) The amount of work that the group has been willing to do on
openacs to date is clearly inadequate.
3) My own level of participation is being seriously limited by
other commitments, which has hampered us to date and is only
likely to get worse.
I'm sorry about this. I still think that there are is a lot of
value in openacs that will be very hard to duplicate in postnuke.
(But there are also things in postnuke that have proven difficult
to duplicate in openacs.) If anyone wishes to argue with this
conclusion/recommendation, like, speak now. Same for questions.
If this meets with general approval, I'll make some suggestions
on how to proceed with postnuke in a future mail.
--
/*
* Tom Hull * thull2 at cox.net * http://www.tomhull.com/
*/
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
- [aclug-L] FW: [webdev] software platform,
Dale W Hodge <=
|
|