Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: April 2002:
[aclug-L] Re: Encrypted/compresed network traffic
Home

[aclug-L] Re: Encrypted/compresed network traffic

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: <discussion@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: Encrypted/compresed network traffic
From: "John Alexander" <johnalexander@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:27:46 -0600
Reply-to: discussion@xxxxxxxxx

Ah, use one compression engine on either end of the link that feeds the hub
that interconnects the three machines.

  +-c/e--the 'Net--c/e--hub--+-----+-----+
  |                          |     |     |
pc(a)                      pc(b) pc(c) pc(d)

An alternative would be to build the compression engine with whatever might
be in the van o' junk and computers to interconnect these segments. You
could use the built-in compression and port forwarding capabilities of ssh
to do this. That just sticks in my head because I learned how to send a vnc
screen over a compressed ssh tunnel last night.

ja
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Jonathan Hall
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:08 PM
To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: Encrypted/compresed network traffic



It'd be easier to use something intended for full network tunneling, such as
IPSec or VTun.  But my goal was to find something that didn't require a
point-to-point connection for security.  I suspect that nothing like that
exists.

-- Jonathan


On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:45:04PM -0600, John Alexander wrote:
> Well, there is a company that is building compression engines that replace
> data segments that get repeated with variable tags, but you'd have to get
> three of them to sit at the intersections of all the machines. Or, you
could
> just ssh -C, and funnel everything over the ports.
>
> ja
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:discussion-bounce@xxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Hall
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:18 PM
> To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [aclug-L] Encrypted/compresed network traffic
>
>
>
> Here's a real general question that may have a rather complex answer.
>
> Given an ethernet segment containing three 3 Linux machines, is there any
> way to encrypt (and possibly compress) all traffic sent to the ethernet
> segment, aside from building tunnels between all 3 machines?
>
> Thanks for any input anyone may have :)
>
> -- Jonathan
>
>
>
> --
> A man in Johannesburg, South Africa, shot his 49-year-old friend in the
> face, seriously wounding him, while the two practiced shooting beer cans
off
> each other's head.
> --
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>   Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx  *  PGP public key available
>  Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (620) 367-2487
>          http://www.futureks.net/  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
>                   -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux  =-
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
>
>
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi

--
Useless fact #1: Rubber bands last longer when refrigerated.
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx  *  PGP public key available
 Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (620) 367-2487
         http://www.futureks.net/  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
                  -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux  =-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]