Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: April 2002:
[aclug-L] Re: Linux for TRS-80
Home

[aclug-L] Re: Linux for TRS-80

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aclug-L] Re: Linux for TRS-80
From: Jonathan Hall <jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 13:34:32 -0600
Reply-to: discussion@xxxxxxxxx

Corection:  I think the proper term is 'quadral' not 'quadary'.  Anyone know
(or care?) for sure? :)


On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 12:08:13PM -0600, Jonathan Hall wrote:
> 
> 59048.  Use trinary.  Since each finger is jointed, it is possible to use a
> three-digit system.
> 
> 0 = finger folded down entirely
> 1 = half extended, half folded down
> 2 = fully extended
> 
> (BTW, in Trinary, 18 is the middle finger fully extended)
> 
> 
> For those with really limber fingers, quadary might be possible on the 4
> fingers (thumbs are only jointed once, so could not be used).  This would
> allow a person to count up to 65535 on their fingers.  If they then use
> their two thumbs as trinary digits as well (a hybrid trinary/quadary
> counting system), you could get up to 524287 using only your fingers and
> thumbs.
> 
> If you want to get really sophisticated, you could add significance to the
> placement and orientation of the hands as well, and still possibly qualify
> as "counting on your fingers."
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:51:15AM -0600, Wilner, Alden wrote:
> > You're right. It takes both hands. Direction doesn't matter. One middle
> > finger will be the 4's bit, the other will be 128.
> > 
> > Trivia question! How high can you count on your fingers?
> > 
> > Answer: 1023, if you use binary.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jonathan Hall [mailto:jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:59 PM
> > > To: discussion@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [aclug-L] Re: Linux for TRS-80
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I don't think you can do that with 5 digits.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:56:20PM -0600, Wilner, Alden wrote:
> > > > Uh, no, either hand, actually.
> > > > 
> > > > And if you flash someone 132 (0x84, 1000100b), be prepared 
> > > to run away
> > > > really fast...
> > > > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > 
> > -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> > visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
> 
> --
> Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.
> --
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>   Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx  *  PGP public key available
>  Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (620) 367-2487
>          http://www.futureks.net/  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
>                   -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux  =-
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> -- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
> visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi

--
Floppy disk tip #1: Never leave diskettes in the drive, as the data can leak
out of the disk and corrode the inner mechanics of the drive.  Diskettes
should be rolled up and stored in pencil holders.
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx  *  PGP public key available
 Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (620) 367-2487
         http://www.futureks.net/  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
                  -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux  =-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]