Complete.Org: Mailing Lists: Archives: discussion: April 1999:
Re: [aclug-L] Y2k?
Home

Re: [aclug-L] Y2k?

[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
To: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [aclug-L] Y2k?
From: Jonathan Hall <jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 12:43:41 -0500 (CDT)
Reply-to: aclug-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Linux itself stores date/time in an integer counting the number of seconds
since (I believe) Jan 1, 1970, rather than in a MM-DD-YY or MM-DD-YYYY
type of syntax, so y2k is a non-issue.

Linux runs out of room in its integer in the year 2038... we have another
39 years to solve that problem. :-)


On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Maverick, Ven-Han Ieong wrote:

> Hi, all
> 
>       A friend of mind ask me "Is linux Y2k compliance?", I think it is,
> since I am support linux..hehe...where I can find the web sites about my
> answer for my knowledge?
>       the "Powered by Linux" square come already?
> 
>       Thanks.
>                                                       Mav
> 
> 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  Jonathan Hall  *  jonhall@xxxxxxxxxxxx  *  PGP public key available
 Systems Admin, Future Internet Services; Goessel, KS * (316) 367-2487
         http://www.futureks.net  *  PGP Key ID: FE 00 FD 51
         -=  Running Debian GNU/Linux 2.0, kernel 2.0.36  =-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]