[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?
[Top] [All Lists]
 
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index] [Thread Index]
 
On Monday 21 January 2002 03:47 pm, you wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/industry/01/21/aol.red.hat.ap/index.html
>
> My quick take:
>
> Good = possible competitor for Microsoft in the "desktop" arena
>
> Bad = every RPM puts and IM icon on your desktop
As the famous biologist E.O. Wilson said: "Evolution creates diversity, not 
conformity." Linux is great because of its diversity. AOL takeovers will not 
help diversity. Just think, had the Unixae made a serious attempt at the 
office-desktop computer, there would be Unix/Linux-style "grown-up" Internet 
everywhere. Instead, we've got stripped-down, anti-peer-to-peer, 
ultra-commercial, toy versions of the Internet such as AOL and Microsoft. AOL 
and Linux do not belong together. One is a chunk of sterile real estate in 
the neoliberal free market wasteland, the other is a thriving World Hive of 
power!!! HAAHAHA!!! (maniacal volkish/anarchist/Marxist/esoteric laughter).
Lb
-- This is the discussion@xxxxxxxxx list.  To unsubscribe,
visit http://tmp2.complete.org/cgi-bin/listargate-aclug.cgi
 
 
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, (continued)
 
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, James O. Harms, 2002/01/23
 - [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Jeff Vian, 2002/01/23
 
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, David Carmichael, 2002/01/23
 
- [aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Michael Moore, 2002/01/27
 - [aclug-L] BeOS, Ivan Trail, 2002/01/27
 - [aclug-L] Re: BeOS, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/01/27
 - [aclug-L] Re: BeOS, David Carmichael, 2002/01/27
 - [aclug-L] Re: BeOS, gLaNDix (Jesse Kaufman), 2002/01/27
 
 
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?,
Lars von dem Ast <=
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Bruce Alderman, 2002/01/21
[aclug-L] Re: Reactions to the following?, Ryan Hunt, 2002/01/23
 
 | 
 |